Kunstkritikk

Sanna-Helena-Berger-Kunstkritikk-Oslo-The-edge-must-be-scalloped-Diorama-Gallery-Oslo

“Which exhibitions, events and publications were the most important, most cutting-edge or most affecting of 2016? The Kunstkritikk Best of cavalcade sums up the art scene of 2016 in contributions written by our own staff and specially invited guests. “
Ellef Prestsæter, curator, critic, member of Scandinavian Institue for Computational Vandalism and PhD scholar in Art History from the University of Oslo choose The edge must be scalloped.

I en tid der installasjonsbildet så å si alltid trumfer installasjonen, og et installasjonsbilde bare er et bilde blant alle andre i strømmen, er det oppløftende å oppleve noen som faktisk bryr seg om utstillingsrommet og som ved hjelp av enkle og presise grep tar rommet i bruk, med sikte på å forvandle betrakteren. For Sanna Helena Berger er ikke den hvite kuben noe speilskap eller ekkokammer, men et subtilt instrument for å modulere sosiale relasjoner, vaner, minner, kropper. «Even in swimming».

In a time when the image of installations trumps the installation itself and an installation-image is nothing but just another one adding to the flood, it is uplifting to experience someone’s work who actually cares about the physical room in which installation occurs. And who by the help of minimal and precise tools makes use of this room with consideration of the visitor, the viewer.
For Sanna Helena Berger, the White Cube is neither mirror or ecochamber but a subtle instrument to moderate social relations, habits, memories and bodies. Even in swimming.
(free translation)

Klingeltaster

Doorbell affixed to the outside of Sorbus Gallery during Agency (properties of pseudo-public spaces as a prelude)

Today’s distance is present in a strange absence of struggle for social co-presence of spectators before the artwork, actual or symbolic as a basis of any work. Situations that are constructed for private use is labelled public even when these situations deliberately exclude others. Trying to shake off the constraints of the ideology of mass-communications, this general mechanisation of social functions gradually reduce our space.
Spaces claiming to be open to all are purposefully counter-active, restricting opportunities for inter-human relations. I suggest then a site-repair; A narrowing down of character-flaws of this space. The hierarchy of the closed space posing as open must be evaluated, not only in this present but in view of the human consciousness. In a culture whose already classical dilemma is the hypertrophy of the intellect it is the assumption that a gesture of anarchistic reclamation of free circulation is a bitter aftertaste of symbolic non-conformism which inevitably will leave you behind. Less likely to achieve ‘success’ and more likely to grow desperate and self-humiliating.

Paradoxically this has tended to promote a status quo of conventional self-censoring pre-agreed pragmatism, endless re-evaluation, curation, and homogeneous neutrality as conservative cultural hierarchy.

The equation between the resulting consequential aesthetics and the market propels us into a regression where we encounter nothing but the deeply entrenched authority of the white male elite. The “art world” is then a sanctuary in which are preserved and assured these types, who would soon be obsolete if left to fight in an intellectual sphere rather than the pen in which they trotter in the search of art as commodity.

Anyone claiming that these arguments have grown tired and orthodox is anyone who brews in the stagnate lukewarm bathwater where the idea that by social exclusion and unavailability we reach higher by reaching fewer.
The same bathers who force us to account for the value of art with marketing statistics and audience figures become essential to securing justification for the arts.

Then any experimentation and right to work without goals or result loose the capability of becoming a gesture or thought in the process. The bather’s statement is then that any socially inclusive art as a reception is only a camouflage fostering aspirations to eventually become socially exclusive art and in its transformation add both intellectual and monetary value both to the work, the artist and the gallery by extension.

Lost is then the discarding and disregarding of institutional spaces and the ambition to maintain a practice that could collapse both socially and politically constructed boundaries in acts of spontaneous communication which could both promote and further movement into truly public spaces. Instead of being herded along the long corridors of bureaucracy and monotony into the most private of domains where rooms within rooms open up for the estimable disadvantage of the shared private experiences of the elite.

Lease of poem “Number 4”, Vantaa Airport

Plaque representing separate lease agreement signed by myself, Maria Gorodeckaya, Emma Siemens – Adolphe and witness Hanna Laura Kaljo, co-founder of Jupiter Woods. The Lease agreement was drawn up as a contractual agreement in consideration to the leasing of Poem “Number 4”, a work by Maria Gorodeckaya leased as a time specific temporary intellectual property by Sanna Helena Berger, the work in its secondary state existing not only as poem but as temporary commodity; A rental. The contract stipulates a one-off leasing of Maria Gorodeckaya’s poem “Number 4“ which featured in the group show Resident / Longshore Drift curated by Jupiter Woods, London at Sorbus Galleria, Vaasankatu 15, 00500 Helsinki, Finland. Poem “Number 4” was re-read by Emma Siemens-Adolphe on Sanna Helena Berger’s request on Tuesday the 26th April 2016 between the hours of 2.30pm and 4.30pm at Vantaa Airport, Helsinki, Finland. The second reading took place outside of the gallery room where it was originally intended to be read and heard, instead, a public poem momentarily re-appropriated by the temporary artist-turned-collector Sanna Helena Berger, momentarily removing the author, the intended reader identity (male) and the intended audience (gallery). Value is not only then added in the form of a one off payment but also stripped from the poem as original – the action of relocation is the predominant act affixed to the work which turns the reading itself into a placeholder or artefact of the trade.

Knackemacka with Matilda Tjäder

Knackemacka
Saturday 12th March, 2016
Mahlowerstraße 3, Berlin

16.00: knäckebröd
16.15: prologue
16.30: Domestic Manifesto

Guests: Anna Sagström, Carson Fisk – Vittori, Derek French, Nadine Goepfert, Charles Pryor, Marleen Boschen,

“Matilda Tjäder and Sanna Helena Berger would like to invite you to make a knäckemacka. A knäckemacka is a layered texture. Start with a crisp bread, crack an egg, a snake of caviar on top. The proposed setting (homestead) is a composition with a precursor – an ode to routine;  a soundscape of every-day scenarios. Crack, crunch, chew. A rhythm unveils. “

      

Semla with Matilda Tjäder

“Matilda Tjäder and Sanna Helena Berger would like to invite you to make a semla.  A semla is a body; a bready mass as a soft mould, hollowed and fused with a binding agent, altering it’s character when re-assembled.”

Semla assembly at Jupiter Woods, London, February 2016 with guests Ming Lin, Guido Santandrea, Felix Riemann, Ali Eisa, Rob Chavasse, Hanna Laura Kaljo, Carolina Ongaro, Rasmus Myrup, Lendl Barcelos, Eloise Bonneviot, Joel Dean, Anne de Boer and Sydney Shen.

A-formal canteen, HFBK

Canteen as part of installation A-formal for HFBK gallery, Hamburg, November 2015
Canteen served stew, rice and bread on the night of the installation opening.

prefix: a-

not; without
“atheistic”

formal

done in accordance with convention or etiquette; suitable for or constituting an official or important occasion.

A range 2015

    

Sanna Helena Berger
A Range
12 – 29 October, 2015

The wait is the anticipation. The initial know-how to-do in a familiar situation, heavy in form and stilted in interaction.
But here its also warm and with soft underlay.
This as much as the action is the consequence of the idea –
A gathering.
The covering – the coat – the ticket to participate – a passive interaction – the action that release a reaction.
You are the deciding factor – the break from the intermittent behaviour.
Here the waiting room is clear and obvious, almost comical.
There, the stark and empty room, too, is a waiting room when not in use. The wait is the anticipation, again.

The 5 part range waits to be released, it is determined by you and the choice of your covering.
A range; arranged, of everyday movements when performed within their natural environment but sculptural in form when taken out of context, then the scene varies. Here the scenarios play out but we begin at home.
The walkings through from street, the white, the view obstructed, to waiting room, clear and literal to domestic areas, incidentally appropriate, to room of emphasised stark action, ah, the art!?

A seemingly mundane posture is elevated in another milieu.
The waiting room behaviour without the environment.
The motion taken out of the everyday scenario; a value change.
Here you come in. You are crucial to every part of the scenario.
The initial question wether what is inside shows outside? How participation can be a passive action? Does the arial view of one body define the distinction between performer and spectator? Subject or object of interaction? There can be no neutral.

Swedish artist Sanna Helena Berger resided in Jupiter Woods throughout October 2015 as its eighth artist-in-residence, employing the house as a temporary home and studio. An installation developed and launched during her residency was laid out between the main gallery space and the back room, creating two dissimilar environments with a shared purpose: to facilitate the act of waiting. The title ‘A Range’ enveloped the project as a whole and referred to Sanna’s ongoing research into a variety of everyday postures and mundane movements, which appear self-evident if applied within their natural habitat, yet become distinctly sculptural when taken out of their familiar context.

The visitor was guided to enter the installation through Jupiter Woods’ back doorway, walking into what seemed like a typical, slightly corporate waiting area. Consequently, by receiving a numbered piece of paper from the cloakroom assistant, the visitor joined a queue, inevitably displaying the mannerism peculiar to waiting rooms. At the same time in the bright white gallery, accessible via the kitchen, a group of three was likewise suspended in anticipation.

Once their number was called the visitor was invited to hand over her coat in exchange for a handmade garment; five of these hung in the back area, each embroidered with a phrase and a number: gesture neutral, arrange, to-do, medium, from scratch. Upon entering the gallery space this piece of clothing would trigger a specific range of movements performed by the body of three. A sequence no longer than five minutes, composed of a series of extracted everyday gestures, disrupted the visitor and performers’ concurrent waiting room behaviour. This encounter was recorded and streamed as a projection visible from the outside of the gallery, providing a further level of participation through passive spectatorship.   

« Previous PageNext Page »